Home
ArXiv.org - June 1st, 2004 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
arxiv_cs

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

June 1st, 2004

A proposal to design expert system for the calculations in the domain of QFT. [cs.AI/0405113] [Jun. 1st, 2004|02:30 pm]

A proposal to design expert system for the calculations in the domain of QFT. [cs.AI/0405113]

Authors: Andrea Severe

Main purposes of the paper are followings: 1) To show examples of the calculations in domain of QFT via ``derivative rules'' of an expert system; 2) To consider advantages and disadvantage that technology of the calculations; 3) To reflect about how one would develop new physical theories, what knowledge would be useful in their investigations and how this problem can be connected with designing an expert system.


read more at cs updates on arXiv.org
linkpost comment

Really Straight Graph Drawings. [cs.DM/0405112] [Jun. 1st, 2004|02:30 pm]

Really Straight Graph Drawings. [cs.DM/0405112]

Authors: Vida Dujmovic, Matthew Suderman, David R. Wood

We study straight-line drawings of graphs with few segments and few slopes. Optimal results are obtained for all trees. Tight bounds are obtained for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. We prove that every 3-connected plane graph on $n$ vertices has a plane drawing with at most $5n/2$ segments and at most $2n$ slopes. We prove that every cubic 3-connected plane graph has a plane drawing with three slopes (and three bends on the outerface). Drawings of non-planar graphs with few slopes are also considered. For example, interval graphs, co-comparability graphs and AT-free graphs are shown to have have drawings in which the number of slopes is bounded by the maximum degree. We prove that graphs of bounded degree and bounded treewidth have drawings with $O(\log n)$ slopes. Finally we prove that every graph has a drawing with one bend per edge, in which the number of slopes is at most one more than the maximum degree.


read more at cs updates on arXiv.org
linkpost comment

Resisting Attrition Attacks on a Peer-to-Peer System. [cs.CR/0405111] [Jun. 1st, 2004|02:30 pm]

Resisting Attrition Attacks on a Peer-to-Peer System. [cs.CR/0405111]

Authors: TJ Giuli, Petros Maniatis, Mary Baker, David S. H. Rosenthal, Mema Roussopoulos

Peer-to-peer systems are vulnerable to attrition attacks that include both traditional, network-level denial of service attacks as well as application-level attacks in which malign peers conspire to waste loyal peers' resources. We describe a set of defenses for the LOCKSS digital preservation system that help ensure that application level attacks even from powerful adversaries are less effective than network-level attacks, and that network-level attacks must be intense, wide-spread, and prolonged to impair the system.


read more at cs updates on arXiv.org
linkpost comment

An analysis of a bounded resource search puzzle. [cs.DS/0405110] [Jun. 1st, 2004|02:31 pm]

An analysis of a bounded resource search puzzle. [cs.DS/0405110]

Authors: Gopal Ananthraman

Consider the commonly known puzzle, given $k$ glass balls, find an optimal algorithm to determine the lowest floor of a building of $n$ floors from which a thrown glass ball will break. This puzzle was originally posed in its original form in \cite{focs1980}and was later cited in the book \cite{algthc}. There are several internet sites that presents this puzzle and its solution to the special case of $k=2$ balls. This is the first such analysis of the puzzle in its general form. Several variations of this puzzle have been studied with applications in Network Loading \cite{cgstctl} which analyzes a case similar to a scenario where an adversary is changing the lowest floor with time. Although the algorithm specified in \cite{algthc} solves the problem, it is not an efficient algorithm. In this paper another algorithm for the same problem is analyzed. It is shown that if $m$ is the minimum number of attempts required then for $k \geq m$ we have $m = \log (n+1)$ and for $k < m$ we have, $1 + \sum_{i=1}^{k}{{m-1}\choose{i}} < n \leq \sum_{i=1}^{k}{{m}\choose{i}}$


read more at cs updates on arXiv.org
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | June 1st, 2004 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]

Advertisement